Brooklynite.
Childhood, Old Age, Disability, and Public Space.
brooklynite
[info]brooklynite
Add to Memories
Tell a Friend
Childhood, Old Age, Disability, and Public Space.
Okay, here's the thing. Here's the thing that those of us who are no longer kids, not yet old, and not presently dealing with disabilities need to understand:

Public space is not our space. Children, the elderly, and people with disabilities don't use parks, restaurants, stores, museums, and theaters at our indulgence, because it's not our space. It's everyone's space, and everyone has an equal claim on it.

Parents who take their kids to adult-oriented places --- myself very much included --- tend to overstate the case for our children. "My kid would never scream in a museum or throw food in a restaurant," we say. " My kid would never impose on other people, and if she did, I'd deal with it. When you're complaining about kids, you're complaining about other people's kids. Don't lump my kid in with them."

But here's my secret: My kid doesn't actually behave as well as I do in museums. Sometimes she whines. Sometimes she has to be reminded to to keep her voice down, or not to run. So yeah, when I take her to the Museum of Modern Art, we do impose on other patrons, at least a little.

And you know what? A little imposition on other patrons is okay. I'll apologize sincerely to anyone she disturbs, but I'm not going to apologize for her presence. Because MoMA is C2's space as much as it is mine.

My sister whines in public sometimes, too. Sometimes she gets overwhelmed and cries. Sometimes she raises her voice. (Running in museums is not an issue with her, I'm happy to say.) If we say that C2 shouldn't go to museums because she might whine or cry or raise her voice, then we have to say that my sister can't go either --- and one of the best days I ever spent with my sister was the day that we visited a MoMA exhibit of design for people with disabilities. MoMA is my sister's space as much as it is mine.

And if we say that people who might whine or cry or raise their voices shouldn't go to museums, then we're going to have to bar my grandmother, too --- if not now then very soon. My grandmother the artist. My grandmother who, when she was in college in Idaho six decades ago, read Dorothy Parker and hung a print of the Rouen cathedral on her wall. My grandmother, whose copies of the catalogues of the MoMA "High and Low" exhibit and the Peggy Guggenheim collection sit on my bookshelf.

MoMA is my grandmother's space far more than it is mine. She almost certainly will never again see the inside of it, but if she does, the rest of the people there will just have to suck it up. She's old, and being old isn't always pretty.

I was talking about all this on the phone with C1 a little while ago, talking about the fact that this way of looking at things is a lot less clean, a lot less comfortable than the "you're complaining about other people's kids, not mine" way. Talking about the question of disruptiveness, and how much is too much. And she reminded me what she tells C2 about riding her Big Wheel on the sidewalk --- that it's not enough to not bump into people, that you have to respect them. You can't ride so fast or so close that you scare them, or make them step out of your way. If you see that they're nervous, you have to slow down even more, and give them even more room. You have to minimize the disruption as much as you can.

Because C2 isn't a lone child zooming through a world of uniformly robust adults. When she's out on the street, she's riding next to other kids who might not be paying attention, and next to old people who might be really worried about falling and shattering a hip, and next to folks carrying heavy and fragile packages, and so on and on. The duty to minimize disruption isn't a duty that the young and the old and those with disabilities have to the robust adults among us, it's a reciprocal duty that each of us, whatever our condition, has to each of our neighbors, whatever their condition.

Each of us has an obligation to refrain from whining too long or too loudly in museums. But each of us also has an obligation to accept the company of others good-naturedly, and to respond with grace when disruptions inevitably occur.


Update: Oh, and one other thing. Children, the elderly, and people with disabilities aren't the only people who occasionally cause disruption in public spaces through no fault of their own. Anyone can be seized by a coughing fit at the ballet.

Tags: , , , ,

Comments
jupiter9 From: [info]jupiter9 Date: August 17th, 2006 05:25 pm (UTC) (Link)
It's amazing to me how easy this lesson is, and how hard people make it. It's simple cooperation.

Everyone can go to the museum, park, whatever.

Everyone who goes should make it easy (or at least easier) for other people to share that space. Whether that means not riding your Big Wheel fast right next to people, or making sure you don't take up the entire hallway if you move slowly, or helping someone who is having difficulty finding the elevator so she can see what's on the second floor.
sadraele From: [info]sadraele Date: August 17th, 2006 06:52 pm (UTC) (Link)
I am sorry to admit that I do have a problem with certain people in public places. It's not children who are still learning to express themselves in appropriate manners. It's not the elderly. It's not people with disabilities. It's people who are grown up enough to know better but still insist on talking loudly on their cell phones and bumping into other people in their way. People who seem to act as if they are completely unaware that there are others around them.

When I see one of those cell phone weilding idiots on my grocery runs, I silently wish that my height impared hooligans will kick up a fuss or throw a tantrum just to interrupt the Cell Idiot's call ;) I think I shall start a new practice. I'll be very obvious about listening in on that person's conversation and when they don't lower their voice, I'll join in and add my perspective on the topic at hand!
alice_q From: [info]alice_q Date: August 17th, 2006 08:31 pm (UTC) (Link)
I'm with you...

The Metropolitan Diary column in the NY Times regularly has witty comments on these cell-phone louts. My favorite was the person who waited until the offender had left the bus they were on, then called the restaurant he'd made a reservation at to cancel it.
thedarkages From: [info]thedarkages Date: August 18th, 2006 03:42 am (UTC) (Link)
I'm sure that your scheme is the Right One, from the standpoint of justice. I have, on one occasion, had reason to doubt it. I was flying on a flight out of Cleveland to New York. I was surrounded on both sides, in the row in front, and the row in back, by eight young children, ages 2-8 (my guess), the parents of whom were sitting in the row two rows ahead of me. Given the howling, the screaming, the kicking on the back of my seat, and the laissez-faire parents, my only option was to get myself reseated. Unfortunately, the stewardesses were busy dealing with a drunk in first class, so that didn't happen. At that point, I felt that the public space of the plane was definitely *my* space, and that the children were impinging on it; how I wished I could impinge on them!

In retrospect, I wonder why the airline couldn't have seated them so that each parent occupied the middle seat of a row with two children on either side. That way, there would only be four unsupervised children. Then again, given the children, the couple may have wanted to sit in a row by themselves.
brooklynite From: [info]brooklynite Date: August 18th, 2006 01:37 pm (UTC) (Link)
I think we're on the same page --- it was your space and their space, but the parents, the kids, and the flight crew weren't taking the necessary steps to make sure they you and they could all use the space with minimal disruption.

Eight kids and two parents on a plane is hard. I'm not going to second-guess their decision to fly, but man, that's hard. It's hard in the best of circumstances. And it boggles my mind that nobody did more to make it easier.

At a bare minimum, one of the parents should have offered to swap seats with you. That would, if I'm visualizing this right, have put the parent in the middle of a box like this:

X X X
X O X
X X X

Which would have been a pretty good perch for that parent to keep an eye on all the kids. If one of them had done that, and ridden herd properly, it would have been a much more peaceful flight for everyone.
willendorf5761 From: [info]willendorf5761 Date: August 18th, 2006 09:30 pm (UTC) (Link)
I have to admit I have a strong bias against any human who has 8 offspring. But it's not the kids' fault they have ridiculous parents. And I should give them the benefit of the doubt and assume the kids are adopted.
brooklynite From: [info]brooklynite Date: August 19th, 2006 06:12 pm (UTC) (Link)
Could have been a blended family, too. Or maybe some of the kids were friends of the family or something. Eight kids in less than eight years takes some doing.
From: [info]mommeof4 Date: December 2nd, 2006 02:13 am (UTC) (Link)

shared public space

Hi,

just found an old post of yours at brooklynite's blog site and wanted to comment that it is most unusual for an airline to seat families with small children in the manner you describe, without a parent in a row with children under age 10.

My suggestion would be to fly a different airline.
tellinellen From: [info]tellinellen Date: August 19th, 2006 02:27 am (UTC) (Link)
i really like the way you think. and i don't mean that in the regular cliche way, i mean i like the way you think things through.

if that makes any sense.
brooklynite From: [info]brooklynite Date: August 19th, 2006 06:14 pm (UTC) (Link)
It does, and thanks.

I'd been meaning to mention, by the way --- and sorry I flaked until now --- that we're throwing a last-minute goodbye to Brooklyn party-type-thing tonight. Starts at five, goes to whenever. If you're around and interested in popping in, drop me a line at the email address in my userinfo, and I'll give you the address.
tellinellen From: [info]tellinellen Date: August 19th, 2006 07:57 pm (UTC) (Link)
wow, the move is so soon? the summer flew.

that sounds great but i just read this now at 4pm and i think all three of us are feeling kind of beat and sweaty. but i appreciate the invite!
screamymimi From: [info]screamymimi Date: August 22nd, 2006 06:31 pm (UTC) (Link)

yeah!

Throw it down, brooklynite.
From: [info]mommeof4 Date: December 2nd, 2006 02:07 am (UTC) (Link)
Okay, here's the thing.

"The duty to minimize disruption isn't a duty that the young and the old and those with disabilities
have to the robust adults among us, it's a reciprocal duty that each of us, whatever our condition,
has to each of our neighbors, whatever their condition."


I love the community-minded spirit present here. Are you really real? You don't, like, change colors the way neo-Christians do when they feel they are in the company of others who won't tell on them, do you?

Here's the thing: I don't hear other people speak this way, and it gets lonely over here.
brooklynite From: [info]brooklynite Date: December 4th, 2006 06:15 pm (UTC) (Link)
Are you really real?

This is pretty much me, yeah. Pomposity and all.

Glad to meet you!
Read 14 comments or Comment
Calendar
Back May 2009
12
3456789
10111213141516
17181920212223
24252627282930
31
Tags
Links
Counter